Moayyad Faris

Country report · .om

14 measured sites

Oman Arabic and RTL website statistics

A measured view of how ranked .om homepages implement Arabic language metadata, document direction, logical CSS, web fonts, and search-friendly markup.

Dataset v3 · collected July 24, 2026 · domains anonymized

Direct answer

57% set a complete Arabic RTL document root

8 of 14 measured .om homepages set both an Arabic language value and dir="rtl" on the HTML element. That places Oman 5 of 11 publishable country samples for this implementation signal. Rankings are descriptive and sensitive to the sample.

Country benchmark

Oman compared with the full sample

57%

Complete Arabic RTL root

8 of 14. Sets an Arabic lang value and dir="rtl" on the HTML element.

3 pp below full sample

71%

Arabic language metadata

10 of 14. Declares Arabic using an HTML language tag.

4 pp below full sample

64%

Root RTL direction

9 of 14. Declares dir="rtl" on the HTML element.

1 pp above full sample

7%

Logical CSS dominant

1 of 14. Uses more logical than physical directional CSS properties.

2 pp above full sample

57%

Arabic web font

8 of 14. Deliberately loads an Arabic-supporting web font.

2 pp below full sample

79%

Canonical link

11 of 14. Publishes a canonical URL in the initial server response.

24 pp above full sample

71%

Meta description

10 of 14. Publishes a meta description in the initial response.

2 pp above full sample

43%

JSON-LD

6 of 14. Publishes JSON-LD structured data.

8 pp above full sample

Strongest measured signal

Canonical link: 79%

This is the highest-adoption signal among the eight indicators summarized in this country report. It describes technical presence, not implementation quality.

Largest opportunity

Logical CSS dominant: 7%

This is the least-adopted measured signal. Teams should verify relevance against their own pages before treating it as a remediation priority.

Country comparison

Comparable country samples

CountrySitesComplete root
Bahrain1182%
Algeria1377%
Saudi Arabia2273%
Egypt1070%
Oman1457%
Iraq2556%
Jordan1856%
Syria1354%
Lebanon1747%
Kuwait1346%
Palestine1638%

Interpretation limits

What this report can—and cannot—say

The sample includes ranked .om homepages returning substantial Arabic content. It does not cover every website hosted in Oman, domains using other TLDs, internal pages, or JavaScript changes after the initial response. Country percentages can move as the ranked list and qualifying sample change.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

How many Omani websites use RTL correctly at the document root?

8 of 14 measured .om homepages (57%) set both an Arabic language and dir="rtl" on the HTML element. This is a ranked ccTLD sample, not a census of every website in Oman.

Is this representative of every website in Oman?

No. The report measures 14 qualifying Arabic-language homepages from the .om portion of the Tranco ranked-domain list. It describes this sample and should not be generalized to every Omani website.

Why compare percentage points rather than relative percentages?

Percentage-point differences make adoption rates directly comparable. A rate of 70% versus 60% is 10 percentage points higher; describing that as a relative percentage can exaggerate the practical gap.